I looked it up and this is a viral click-bate article. Legal Context: In real-world jurisprudence, a property or vehicle owner is generally not held civilly liable for injuries or death sustained by a trespasser or car thief who illegally takes their vehicle off private property, especially when the vehicle was not actively being driven or offered to the public by the owner at the time.
So while it sounds like it could be true in today's legal environment, it didn't happen. Link
Damn asshole judges always siding with criminals.
ReplyDeleteNot fair, if you die in the commission of a crime thats on you.
ReplyDeleteExile1981
Well at least he's dead.
ReplyDeleteNo, this was not a fair judgement.
ReplyDeleteWhere did this occur, Kalifucktupindahaid?
The car owner should countersue da momma
for raising a crimnal for $1.8M
I looked it up and this is a viral click-bate article.
ReplyDeleteLegal Context: In real-world jurisprudence, a property or vehicle owner is generally not held civilly liable for injuries or death sustained by a trespasser or car thief who illegally takes their vehicle off private property, especially when the vehicle was not actively being driven or offered to the public by the owner at the time.
So while it sounds like it could be true in today's legal environment, it didn't happen.
Link
Steve